Intellectual Property
Our Law Firm is best known for its unrivalled expertise in the field of "protection of ideas", namely Intellectual Property.
Intellectual Property is the legal discipline concerning the products of the creative and inventive activity of humans (trademarks, patents, models, designs, images and photographs, creative and artistic works, software, databases, trade secrets, know-how…). According to a survey conducted by the Italian financial newspaper IlSole24Ore-Statista, the Canella Camaiora Law Firm has been awarded as one of the best Italian law firms in the area of Intellectual Property for the fifth year in a row (2020-2021-2022-2023-2024).
We assist clients throughout Italy on a daily basis, thanks to our in-depth expertise. You can contact us by booking an initial consultation meeting (by appointment in our office, by phone or even by videoconference).
Do you want to receive now a personalized quote? Click on the “CALCULATE A QUOTE” button below. Answer a few simple questions and you’ll get a quote in less than two minutes.
During the appointment, we listen attentively to the clients and assess their protection needs. You can read more in our information page dedicated to the first appointment.
We also offer support and assistance in Intellectual Property to many of our fellow lawyers (whether generalists or specialists in other areas). Our extensive experience in this sector gives us the ability to offer the best possible assistance, even in court.
About our Clients. The distinctive expertise of our Law Firm leads us to work with a wide range of Clients throughout Italy:
- Startups;
- SMEs and entrepreneurs;
- Major companies;
- Inventors;
- Designers and architectural firms;
- Stylists;
- Authors and publishers;
- Programmers and software houses.
It is worth remembering that beyond the legal regulations on competition and intellectual property, entrepreneurs are free. Intellectual property rights are essentially time-limited, exclusive exploitation rights. When claiming counterfeiting, plagiarism or infringement, one must be sure that the right being asserted is valid, effective and still in force. Conversely, in the event of being accused of having copied, “copying” may actually be considered our right if the patent title (or the copyright) is invalid or expired. In other words, it is always essential to rely on the professional support of an intellectual property expert.
Intellectual Property
Trademarks Registration
Authors' Rights and Copyright
Art Law
Unfair Competition and Counterfeiting
Inventions and Patents
Design Law
Image and Photography
Intangible Assets Evaluation
Software registration with SIAE
Do you want to receive now a personalized quote? Click on the “CALCULATE A QUOTE” button below. Answer a few simple questions and you’ll get a quote in less than two minutes.

When a work has multiple rights holders, who decides how it can be exploited?
When the economic exploitation rights in a copyright-protected work belong to more than one person, must everyone agree before distribution rights can be granted to [...]

Plagiarism in art: when can a gallery also be held liable, and what harm can a foundation suffer?
Imitating an artist’s style is not, in itself, enough to constitute plagiarism: copyright protects the creative form of specific works, not ideas, techniques or artistic [...]

Can heirs take action against a fake work attributed to a deceased artist? (Italian Supreme Court, Civil Section, No. 15821/2026)
When a work is falsely attributed to a deceased artist, can the heirs or other family members ask a court to establish that it is [...]

Can a work be published online if it is in the public domain only in certain countries?
A work may be in the public domain in one country while still protected by copyright in another. Putting it online therefore does not necessarily [...]

Should Facebook pay newspapers? Fair compensation after the Meta–AGCOM Judgment
News costs money to produce and has value for those who distribute it online. In the Meta–AGCOM judgment, the Court of Justice of the European [...]

Law 104 leave between annual leave and sick leave: caregiving purpose, holidays and the risk of abuse
The paid leave provided for under Law No. 104/1992 allows employees to be absent from work for needs connected with their own disability or to [...]

Copyright and the dual-track sanctions system: limits on combining criminal and administrative penalties (Supreme Sourt No. 15440/2026)
Can the same copyright infringement be punished twice? A recent decision of the Italian Supreme Court, No. 15440/2026, provides an opportunity to revisit a particularly [...]

Employee recording workplace conversations: when it is lawful and what the employer can do
Is it lawful to record workplace conversations? May an employee record a meeting, a discussion with their manager, or a conversation with colleagues without informing [...]

The half-million-euro mistake: the case of the incorrectly dated painting
How much is a work of art worth? The factors that determine price are certainly many, from the signature to the dimensions of the piece, [...]

International circulation of works of art: what changes with Law No. 40/2026
Law No. 40 of 17 March 2026 amends several provisions of the Cultural Heritage Code concerning the circulation, enhancement and management of works of art. [...]

Google vs. Hindware: trademark bidding and the cost of defending your brand
Using another party’s trademark as an advertising keyword is not generally prohibited under European law, but it can become unlawful when it impairs the trademark’s [...]

The right to be forgotten and Google delisting: when is compensation for damage available? Italian Supreme Court No. 6433/2026
Does an infringement of the “right to be forgotten” automatically give rise to a claim for damages? In its decision No. 6433 of 18 March [...]