Inventions and Patents

We provide daily assistance with the registration and legal protection of patents in Italy, across Europe, and worldwide.

Every invention holds significant economic potential: securing a patent transforms technical innovation into an exclusive, enforceable, and transferable right. A patent enables the holder to manufacture, market, or license their invention with the certainty of solid legal protection.

Without filing, however, no legal safeguard exists: premature disclosure may lead to the irreversible loss of rights, allowing third parties to freely access and exploit the invention.

Canella Camaiora® supports inventors, companies, and research teams with a multidisciplinary approach that combines legal strategy with technical competence. For the sixth consecutive year (2020–2025), the firm has been recognized by Il Sole 24 Ore–Statista as one of Italy’s top law firms for Intellectual Property, a distinction based on an independent survey of attorneys, in-house counsel, and clients, attesting to the quality and excellence of our work.

Do you want to receive now a personalized quote? Click on the “CALCULATE A QUOTE” button below. Answer a few simple questions and you’ll get a quote in less than two minutes.

An original technical solution can represent a decisive competitive advantage. Registering a patent means consolidating the economic value of innovation and preventing third parties from misappropriating it. Patent protection is an indispensable element in any industrial strategy aimed at investments, partnerships, licensing, or technology transfer.

However, legal protection arises only upon filing. Any prior disclosure—even if unintentional—may irreversibly destroy the possibility of securing patent rights. For this reason, timing is critical to the strategic success of any invention.

Patent or utility model?

Choosing between a patent and a utility model depends on the nature of the innovation and its inventive step.

In Italy, an invention patent protects new and non-obvious technical solutions for a maximum of 20 years from the filing date. A utility model, by contrast, is suited for functional improvements to existing products and offers protection for 10 years (initially 5 years, renewable once).

Both forms require formal filing to secure exclusive rights.

Concrete examples clarify the distinction: the invention of the internal combustion engine (1876) by Nikolaus Otto or the PageRank algorithm (1994) by Google were patented as revolutionary inventions. By contrast, a telescopic broom enabling adjustable height or an improved bottle closure system would typically qualify for protection as utility models—practical innovations, perhaps not groundbreaking, but highly valuable.

International patent protection strategy

Patent protection is inherently territorial: a patent safeguards an invention only within the jurisdiction where it is granted. Accordingly, careful planning of an international protection strategy is crucial to achieving industrial and commercial objectives.

The first step is filing an Italian patent application with the Italian Patent and Trademark Office (UIBM) for national protection.

Those seeking broader coverage may file a European patent application with the European Patent Office (EPO). Once granted, the European patent must be validated in each designated state. Alternatively, the European patent with unitary effect offers uniform protection across participating EU member states, streamlining administration and significantly reducing maintenance costs.

Another option is the international patent application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), administered by WIPO. This procedure provides provisional protection in over 150 countries through a single filing, after which the applicant must enter national or regional phases to secure final grants in the chosen jurisdictions.

Effective territorial extension planning not only maximizes innovation protection but also optimizes costs, preserves commercial flexibility, and builds a solid competitive advantage globally.

Patent infringement, legal defense, and damages

Patent infringement constitutes one of the most serious violations of industrial property rights. Unauthorized use of a protected invention exposes the infringer to significant legal consequences, both in terms of the immediate cessation of the infringement and the obligation to compensate the rights holder for the damages incurred.

In cases of counterfeiting or unlawful use, the patent holder is entitled to seek urgent injunctive relief to block the unauthorized exploitation, to obtain the seizure of counterfeit goods, and to claim full compensation for the damages suffered. Recoverable damages include not only loss of profits, corresponding to lost business opportunities, and actual damages, related to direct economic loss, but also moral damages, arising from the harm caused to the reputation, commercial image, and credibility of the inventor or the rights holder.

Canella Camaiora® is widely recognized for its excellence in patent litigation. The firm provides comprehensive assistance, from the preparation of technical and legal opinions to the management of both extrajudicial and judicial proceedings, through to the enforcement of final decisions.

Our approach is guided by unwavering determination: operating effectively in this sector requires swift, precise, and forceful action, protecting exclusive rights and enhancing both the economic and moral value of innovation.

Acting without delay and with surgical precision is essential to strengthen the commercial position, limit damages, and consolidate a lasting competitive advantage in the market.

Inventions and Patents

First Intellectual Property Appointment

First Intellectual Property Appointment

Patentability verification and prior art search

Patentability verification and prior art search

Drafting and filing patent applications

Drafting and filing patent applications

Patent protection

Patent protection

FTO - Freedom To Operate

FTO - Freedom To Operate

Protection of trade secrets and know-how

Protection of trade secrets and know-how

Advice on utility models

Advice on utility models

Do you want to receive now a personalized quote? Click on the “CALCULATE A QUOTE” button below. Answer a few simple questions and you’ll get a quote in less than two minutes.

Quando un’opera ha più titolari chi decide come può essere sfruttata

When a work has multiple rights holders, who decides how it can be exploited?

When a work has multiple rights holders, who decides how it can be exploited?

When the economic exploitation rights in a copyright-protected work belong to more than one person, must everyone agree before distribution rights can be granted to [...]

1 September 2026

Plagio artistico quando risponde anche la galleria e quale danno può subire una fondazione

Plagiarism in art: when can a gallery also be held liable, and what harm can a foundation suffer?

Plagiarism in art: when can a gallery also be held liable, and what harm can a foundation suffer?

Imitating an artist’s style is not, in itself, enough to constitute plagiarism: copyright protects the creative form of specific works, not ideas, techniques or artistic [...]

10 August 2026

Gli eredi possono agire contro un falso attribuito all’artista defunto_ (Cass. civ. n. 15821_2026)

Can heirs take action against a fake work attributed to a deceased artist? (Italian Supreme Court, Civil Section, No. 15821/2026)

Can heirs take action against a fake work attributed to a deceased artist? (Italian Supreme Court, Civil Section, No. 15821/2026)

When a work is falsely attributed to a deceased artist, can the heirs or other family members ask a court to establish that it is [...]

7 August 2026

Si può pubblicare online un’opera se è in pubblico dominio solo in alcuni Paesi

Can a work be published online if it is in the public domain only in certain countries?

Can a work be published online if it is in the public domain only in certain countries?

A work may be in the public domain in one country while still protected by copyright in another. Putting it online therefore does not necessarily [...]

Facebook deve pagare i giornali L’equo compenso dopo la sentenza Meta–AGCOM

Should Facebook pay newspapers? Fair compensation after the Meta–AGCOM Judgment

Should Facebook pay newspapers? Fair compensation after the Meta–AGCOM Judgment

News costs money to produce and has value for those who distribute it online. In the Meta–AGCOM judgment, the Court of Justice of the European [...]

Permessi Legge 104 tra ferie e malattia_ finalità assistenziale, vacanze e rischio di abuso

Law 104 leave between annual leave and sick leave: caregiving purpose, holidays and the risk of abuse

Law 104 leave between annual leave and sick leave: caregiving purpose, holidays and the risk of abuse

The paid leave provided for under Law No. 104/1992 allows employees to be absent from work for needs connected with their own disability or to [...]

28 July 2026

Diritto d’autore e doppio binario sanzionatorio: i limiti del cumulo tra penale e amministrativo (Cass. n. 15440/2026)

Copyright and the dual-track sanctions system: limits on combining criminal and administrative penalties (Supreme Sourt No. 15440/2026)

Copyright and the dual-track sanctions system: limits on combining criminal and administrative penalties (Supreme Sourt No. 15440/2026)

Can the same copyright infringement be punished twice? A recent decision of the Italian Supreme Court, No. 15440/2026, provides an opportunity to revisit a particularly [...]

Dipendente che registra conversazioni sul lavoro: quando è lecito e cosa può fare l’azienda

Employee recording workplace conversations: when it is lawful and what the employer can do

Employee recording workplace conversations: when it is lawful and what the employer can do

Is it lawful to record workplace conversations? May an employee record a meeting, a discussion with their manager, or a conversation with colleagues without informing [...]

15 July 2026

L’errore da mezzo milione di euro_ il caso del dipinto erroneamente datato

The half-million-euro mistake: the case of the incorrectly dated painting

The half-million-euro mistake: the case of the incorrectly dated painting

How much is a work of art worth? The factors that determine price are certainly many, from the signature to the dimensions of the piece, [...]

1 July 2026

Circolazione internazionale delle opere d’arte: cosa cambia con la legge n. 40/2026

International circulation of works of art: what changes with Law No. 40/2026

International circulation of works of art: what changes with Law No. 40/2026

Law No. 40 of 17 March 2026 amends several provisions of the Cultural Heritage Code concerning the circulation, enhancement and management of works of art. [...]

30 June 2026

Google vs Hindware_ il trademark bidding e il costo di difendere il proprio marchio

Google vs. Hindware: trademark bidding and the cost of defending your brand

Google vs. Hindware: trademark bidding and the cost of defending your brand

Using another party’s trademark as an advertising keyword is not generally prohibited under European law, but it can become unlawful when it impairs the trademark’s [...]

Diritto all’oblio e deindicizzazione Google: quando spetta il risarcimento del danno? La Cassazione fa chiarezza

The right to be forgotten and Google delisting: when is compensation for damage available? Italian Supreme Court No. 6433/2026

The right to be forgotten and Google delisting: when is compensation for damage available? Italian Supreme Court No. 6433/2026

Does an infringement of the “right to be forgotten” automatically give rise to a claim for damages? In its decision No. 6433 of 18 March [...]

26 June 2026

error: Content is protected !!