Abstract
Setting up a startup (or converting a sole proprietorship into a company) by contributing intellectual property as share capital can reduce cash needs and bring order to strategic assets. However, as a general rule, the transaction works only if the intangible asset is truly transferable, capable of valuation, and backed by a “clean” chain of title.
This article explains which company-law rules affect contributions to an Italian S.r.l. and how, in practice, to structure the appraisal and due diligence so as to reach the notarial deed with sustainable structuring choices.
When it makes sense to set up an S.r.l. with know-how and software
In the typical case, a team develops software together with a set of procedures, technical documentation, training models, pipelines, and operating practices: these are know-how or IP rights that may be worth more than the cash available. In such cases, it becomes a practical opportunity to launch the company by contributing these assets, thereby allocating equity interests to the founders without tying up cash and, at the same time, presenting investors and business partners with a clearer ownership framework.
At times, this is also the path for a sole proprietorship that intends to become a company, perhaps to create an “asset shield” through limited liability (on this point, see Sole Shareholder of an S.r.l.: What Are the Risks and How Can You Protect Your Assets?).
In short, contributing intellectual property is often an accelerator: it helps align the startup’s capital with its economic substance and can make a fundraising path more credible. But beware: precisely because the capital “rests” on an intangible asset, a rigorous corporate-law framework is essential to prevent the valuation from remaining a mere promise and instead becoming a weakness in an investment setting or, worse, in litigation.
It is worth knowing which rules govern contributions in an S.r.l. and where an S.p.A. follows different logic.
The Italian rules governing contributions of intangible assets to an S.r.l.
With respect to an S.r.l., any asset capable of economic valuation may be contributed, provided that the overall value of the contributions may not be less than the share capital. In practice, the advantage is the ability to form the company even when cash is limited, by bringing into capital the asset that supports the business.
However, it is not enough to refer generically to “know-how” or “software”. As to the subject matter, one must define what is being transferred and where its boundaries lie: full ownership of the rights (where it exists), economic exploitation rights, or a license (often one aims for exclusivity to reduce ambiguity).
In particular, know-how may fall within the protection of trade secrets under Articles 98 and 99 of the Italian Industrial Property Code where it consists of technical-industrial information and experience (including commercial information, such as customer acquisition and management pipelines, or customer and qualified supplier lists) that are
- secret,
- have economic value because they are secret, and
- are protected by reasonable confidentiality measures.
As for software, the usual form of protection is copyright under Italian Law No. 633 of 1941 on computer programs; for that reason, the key issue is the chain of title (developers, consultants, repositories, any open-source components) and the actual ability to transfer or license the economic exploitation rights. Very briefly, the rules governing computer programs include, among the exclusive rights, the power to authorize reproduction, modification/transformation, and distribution of the program: if the contributor is not in fact the rightsholder (or cannot validly grant those rights), the transaction risks losing substance.
Where the contribution is made in kind, the key requirement is an expert appraisal: a sworn report containing a description of the assets, the criteria applied, and a statement that the value is at least equal to the amount attributed to share capital (and any share premium), to be attached to the deed of incorporation. Accordingly, the value cannot remain a narrative formula: it must be supportable, reasoned, and consistent with verifiable evidence.
Italian law allows the transaction and offers tools that are useful for startups, but it also requires the parties to remain within technical and documentary boundaries: that is where the appraisal and due diligence (especially for software and know-how) become a structural part of the transaction rather than a merely ancillary formality.
What checks and appraisals are needed to contribute intellectual property
The appraisal is the moment at which a value is assigned to the intangible asset.
In practice, the valuation of know-how is often grouped into three families of approaches:
- notional royalties (relief-from-royalty), where one estimates how much it would “cost” to license that know-how and discounts that value back to the appraisal date;
- incremental income (attributable cash flows) that asks what incremental economic benefits the business derives from having and using that know-how; and
- replacement/reproduction cost (historical cost) or how much it would cost to recreate it (for a fuller discussion of these approaches, see The Economic Valuation of Know-How: The Value of “Knowing How”).
For software assets and technology IP, the income approach is often expressed through discounted cash flow (DCF), that is, by projecting expected revenue/cash flow and discounting it to present value. (WIPO: Intellectual Property Valuation Basics for Technology Transfer Professionals – 6 The income approach)
However the appraisal, by itself, does not answer the question an investor (or a buyer) immediately asks: who really owns the rights, and what encumbrances or hidden defects exist. The due diligence is, therefore, the “reality check” for the contribution.
Absent a clean chain of title, for example, the contribution risks becoming a point of friction: disputes among founders, rights claimed by former collaborators, noncompliant licenses, or material that is not transferable because it exists only in the head of the person who created it.
Consider the case of contributing software made up of third-party or open-source code. Without establishing exclusive rights in the code, it makes no sense to talk about value. Absent credible due diligence, in fact, it becomes downright risky to keep intellectual property on the company’s books, because it exposes the business to challenges from stakeholders and tax authorities.
During due diligence, dedicated checklists and compliance standards are often used precisely to measure maturity and risk. Know-how and rights in software can be counted among the riskiest because they are highly subject to fluctuations in value and because they are tied to a right that is not evidenced by certificates and registrations, as is the case with trademarks and designs. Yet they are currently at the center of the value of many businesses.
For these reasons, such assets should not be ignored; on the contrary, carrying out due diligence becomes essential in valuing them.
At this point, the challenge is to translate the framework into practical steps, so that the transaction will hold up before the notary, the valuation expert, future investors, and, unfortunately, a judge.
Structuring the practical steps
Before formalizing the contribution, it is advisable to put in place a documentation and technical framework capable of supporting the appraisal, due diligence, and governance, especially if the transaction arises from a “software-first” startup or from a sole proprietorship that is organizing itself in corporate form:
- Mapping the contributed IP: a detailed, verifiable description of the software, repositories, documentation, processes, datasets, and know-how (what is included and what remains outside the contribution).
- Verifying the chain of title: contracts with developers, consultants, and collaborators; assignment or ownership-allocation clauses; management of credentials and materials, since the risk often lies in the “pieces” scattered around.
- Measures to protect know-how: confidentiality, access controls, tracking, internal policies, and information management, because the value of know-how also depends on its secrecy and identifiability (for more, see When a company’s value depends on know-how… that can walk out the door).
- Audit and compliance: inventorying dependencies, checking licenses, preparing notices and documentation, and adopting a framework consistent with market benchmarks, especially if the company is aiming for investment rounds or M&A.
- Choosing the structure of the contribution: transfer of ownership or grant of rights (exclusive/non-exclusive), with a clear contractual perimeter as to territory, duration, updates, and maintenance, so as to avoid ambiguity at a later stage.
- Alignment among founders: preliminary agreements—including through an MoU—on contributions, roles, and governance principles, so that intellectual property does not become a source of future conflict (Guide to the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU): A Key Tool for Startups and Collaborations).
Consistently, the transaction should conclude with an “investor-ready” dossier: appraisal, chain of title, open-source audit, technical description of the asset, and contractual choices, so that the share capital based on intellectual property can support growth, contracts, and subsequent rounds.
© Canella Camaiora S.t.A. S.r.l. - All rights reserved.
Publication date: 20 March 2026
Textual reproduction of the article is permitted, even for commercial purposes, within the limit of 15% of its entirety, provided that the source is clearly indicated. In the case of online reproduction, a link to the original article must be included. Unauthorised reproduction or paraphrasing without indication of source will be prosecuted.
Gabriele Rossi
Laureato in giurisprudenza, con esperienza nella consulenza legale a imprese, enti e pubbliche amministrazioni.